Automotive Research

After Uber, Tesla incidents, can artificial intelligence be trusted?

After Uber, Tesla incidents, can artificial intelligence be trusted?

In light of recent accidents with autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicles, will people put their trust in ? Missouri S&T researchers are digging for answers. Given the choice of riding in an Uber driven by a human or a self-driving version, which would you choose?

SwissCognitiveConsidering last month’s fatal crash of a self-driving Uber that took the life of a woman in Tempe, Arizona, and the recent death of a test-driver of a semi- being developed by Tesla, peoples’ trust in the technology behind autonomous vehicles may also have taken a hit. The reliability of self-driving cars and other forms of is one of several factors that affect humans’ trust in , machine and other technological advances, write two Missouri University of Science and Technology researchers in a recent journal article.

“Trust is the cornerstone of humanity’s relationship with ,” write Dr. Keng Siau, professor and chair of business and information technology at Missouri S&T, and Weiyu Wang, a Missouri S&T graduate student in information science and technology. “Like any type of trust, trust in takes time to build, seconds to break and forever to repair once it is broken.”

The Uber and Tesla incidents point to the need to rethink the way applications such as systems are developed, and for designers and manufacturers of these systems to take certain steps to build greater trust in their products, Siau says.

Despite these recent incidents, Siau sees a strong future for , but one fraught with trust issues that must be resolved.

‘A dynamic process’

“Trust building is a dynamic process, involving movement from initial trust to continuous trust development,” Siau and Wang write in “Building Trust in , Machine , and Robotics,” published in the February 2018 issue of Cutter Business Technology Journal.

In their article, Siau and Wang examine prevailing concepts of trust in general and in the context of applications and human-computer interaction. They discuss the three types of characteristics that determine trust in this area – human, environment and technology – and outline ways to engender trust in applications.

Siau and Wang point to five areas that can help build initial trust in systems:

  • Representation. The more “human” a technology is, the more likely humans are to trust it. “That is why humanoid robots are so popular,” Siau says, adding that it is easier to “establish an emotional connection” with a that looks and acts more like a human or a robotic dog that acts more like a canine. Perhaps first-generation autonomous vehicles should have a humanoid “chauffeur” behind the wheel to help ease concerns.
  • Image or perception. Science fiction books and movies have given a bad image, Siau says. People tend to think of in dystopian terms, as colored by Terminator or Bladerunner movies or Isaac Asimov and Philip K. Dick novels. “This image and perception will affect people’s initial trust in ,” Siau and Wang write.
  • Reviews from other users. People tend to rely on online product reviews, and “a positive review leads to greater initial trust.”
  • Transparency and “explainability.” When a technology’s inner workings are hidden in a “black box,” that opacity can hinder trust. “To trust applications, we need to understand how they are programmed and what function will be performed in certain conditions,” Siau says.
  • Trialability. The ability to test a new application before being asked to adapt it leads to greater acceptance, Siau says.

[…]

  1. oded yaron

    @SwissCognitive Well, no. But can human intelligence be trusted?

  2. Marc Stampfli

    @SwissCognitive Wrong question. Would you enter a car with your human friend looking at car accident… https://t.co/JO7tJuENQE

  3. Mr. M

    @SwissCognitive Good question with complicated answer. A better question though: “can AI developers be trusted?”

  4. Praveen Swaraj

    @SwissCognitive An #AI is just a program limited by programmer’s insight…so back to school to shar… https://t.co/pfDpPX0K5j

  5. Ronald Vermeij

    @Tsundu_Mak @SwissCognitive No, since #AI intelligence is …. (dumb) … “artificial”, not “Human”… https://t.co/c8BMFAdurX

Leave a Reply